#Xnview mp t vs ctrl t mac os x#
#Xnview mp t vs ctrl t pro#
#Xnview mp t vs ctrl t software#
#Xnview mp t vs ctrl t professional#

I don’t really understand the technical details terribly well and to use RPP, I don’t think you need to. RPP’s different approach to raw conversion: darker results If you were really broke, you could use RPP with Picasa, although then you’d have to deal with Picasa’s dislike for tiffs, perhaps by saving your processed RPP output as jpegs instead. But it would make perfect sense to use RPP with, say, Photoshop.

#Xnview mp t vs ctrl t pro#

Considering that DxO Optics Pro is also trying to be the best raw converter available, using RPP with DxO Optics Pro probably wouldn’t make any sense.

#Xnview mp t vs ctrl t software#

I should probably add here that, although I’m using RPP with Lightroom, you can use Lightroom with any additional software you like. But in my experience with RPP so far, the small extra effort usually pays off. Seems like a hassle, I know, and indeed, it isn’t necessary. After all, you could take what Lightroom (well, Adobe Camera Raw) dishes out and be grateful for it. Synchronize that folder in your Lightroom library so the new file appears there, and finish your editing in Lightroom.

Load the photo, click the Apply button (to apply the default conversion settings), then save the new file (as a tiff) back into the same folder where the original is stored. The good news is, you don’t really have to do much with the user interface at all. It’s frankly a bit scary and unless you’re a serious photo editing geek, you probably won’t immediately see the purpose of the various options. If, like me, you are fond of Lightroom for its intuitive user interface and dislike using Photoshop because you don’t think in terms of numbers, well, then, like me, you’ll find RPP’s user interface a bit off-putting, especially at first.

#Xnview mp t vs ctrl t professional#

Here’s a photo converted by RPP using the P160NP preset, which mimics the look of Kodak’s Professional PORTRA 160NC (Natural Color) film.Ĭonverted by RPP using P160NP film preset. It’s limited because it isn’t trying to do much. But the basic point of RPP is conversion of the raw file. I can tweak exposure, color, sharpness, and even ask RPP to convert the image to mimic the look of certain types of film. Not only does this process take a little extra time, it also creates a fairly large extra file that would not be created if I never left Lightroom.Īctually, RPP’s user interface does allow me to make a number of basic adjustments prior to conversion. I have to leave Lightroom and open the raw file in RPP, convert it (usually to a tiff file), then reopen the converted file in Lightroom again to finish editing it (cropping, adjusting exposure, color, detail and sharpness, etc.). Now, with RPP in my workflow, it’s like old days once again. Back in the days before Lightroom and Aperture and other “raw workflow” applications came into being, you put your raw files on the computer and then you had to convert them to tiffs or jpegs before being able to work on them in Photoshop. Using RPP adds an explicit extra step to my workflow: conversion. That’s why I called RPP’s concept retro. I was using it without being aware of it. I remember when I first heard other people talking about ACR, I didn’t know what it was.

And when I make an adjustment (say, increasing the contrast setting) Lightroom immediately updates what I see on screen. Lightroom’s raw conversion software, Adobe Camera Raw (ACR), works more or less invisibly in the background, rendering images for display on my screen and, I presume, assisting when images are exported to another format (usually jpeg). I can open and view raw files in Lightroom as soon as I’ve imported them into Lightroom’s catalog.

When I process a photo in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, I don’t really have to deal with conversion at all. I’ve been trying RPP out lately and I’m impressed.

How does this one-trick pony survive? By doing its one trick really, really well.

And you can’t do any digital asset management with it. It’s not a raw workflow program like Aperture or Lightroom. It’s a raw processor or converter, and that’s all that it is.

#Xnview mp t vs ctrl t mac os x#

Andrey Tverdokhleb’s Raw Photo Processor (RPP) is a Mac OS X application that in some ways seems rather retro in its concept.